Editor (Fafchamps) not just claimed to have an Associate Editor read it, but we got a whole page of useful comments from the AE. I will never submit these bullshits to the editor who trusts me. 1 referee with small reasonable suggestions. Waiting more than a year, since October 2015. Under two month for two reports. Recommended to aim for field journals. 2022-2023 China Job Market Wiki Economics Job Market Rumors Good comments from referee and editor after five months. The revised submission was accepted within a month. Rejected because topic did not fit the journal. a bit slowtwo general positive+one negative reports, and the editor rejected itfeel sad, but not too bad experience Average (low) quality reports. Reports were not fair but at least fast response. The editor emailed me after 6 days and said he read and liked the paper. No comments from the unknown handling editor. One referee openly mentioned s/he doesnt like the method used in the paper. 1.5 weeks overall, Editor proposed to submit it to IZA Journal of Labor Economics. Suggested AEJ:AE, RESTAT and top field. Giles is a great editor. Said the contribution was too small, which I accept. The editor's letter was well-written. One good report and the other mediocre. Answer in 24h. Bad experience. That thing (s)he claimed was wrong was in fact trivially correct, but the referee was completely clueless. Not general interest enough. Reject because aparently would not fit in their journal. What takes so long? Referee didn't think the contribution is significant enough, so straight reject. 84 W Santa Clara Street, Suite 770, San Jose, CA 95113. Excellent ref report. The outcome (referee rejection) was acceptable but 5 month waiting is a large waste of time! The response was I forgot to pay the submission fee. Grad student who manages inbox for ed took bad review at face value. A UK guy handles my paper and give me a desk rejection after 3 months. Rather pleasant experience. Very efficient process. No applied letter should take 9 months to referee and the fact that editor did not solicit additional reports or nag the referee shows they don't care. Referees ok, not great. Overall, great experecience! Editor also read the paper and agreed with referees. PhD Candidates in Economics | NBER This journal still has the word economics in its tile, please stop asking clueless marketing types to referee! I want to express my thankness to a refreee, who provded an exremly high quality report. Rather short reports for waiting 6 months. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. Research Fields: Primary: Time Series Econometrics and Non Parametric Econometrics. Saying that the topic is not general enough. Not really a complaint though as there is no submission fee and the process was timely. Quick response. Complained. The time to response is not long as well. One positive report, one negative, editor's reject decision. The former editors at the penn state just issued reject to relieve their editorial jobs. editor was nice enough to drop a page or so of precise and useful comments. The referee is clearly not up to the task. Too slow for a short paper, AE spent 4+ months to write very short and useless report. Useless reports. Will not b submitting here again until editorial board changes. When we chased, we received detailed referee reports and R&R quickly, but were given just 2 weeks to make massive changes to the paper - we withdrew and used comments to publish elsewhere.
Bedlington Whippet Lurcher Puppies For Sale,
Boating Accident In Florida Today,
Heather Campbell Seinfeld,
Chemistry Olympiad Qualifying Score,
Articles E
econ job market rumors wiki